Contact information and NAD+ corrections
Legal NAD currently publishes no editorial inbox or working contact form. This page describes the information a useful NAD+ correction would include.
Correction details
A useful objection identifies the page address and the sentence at issue. If a paper gives a different result, its title and the relevant passage help identify the disagreement. A broken study link or missing regulatory document is worth reporting too.
A concrete discrepancy between a page and a paper can be checked. A broad endorsement of a treatment leaves the disputed claim unidentified. Public study details are sufficient; private health information has no place in an editorial correction.
Health decisions
Medical decisions need a clinician who can assess the person concerned. I cannot select a product, determine an amount or advise on an injection through this website. The research page and study amounts explain what the cited experiments tested.